Property Finder
Listings published from Bitrix24 or synced back from the portal, and every lead — form, call and WhatsApp — landing in the CRM with the listing reference and agent already attached.
Bitrix24 is an all-in-one CRM that Dubai and Abu Dhabi brokerages use to run listings, leads and tenancy in one system. Corporate Intellect Solutions implements it end to end — Property Finder, Bayut and Dubizzle feeds into a single pipeline, agent-level attribution, WhatsApp on the official API, and RERA and Ejari fields where your compliance team needs them.

Bitrix24 real estate CRM is a configuration of the Bitrix24 platform built around how a property brokerage actually works: a listing inventory, a lead pipeline fed by the portals, a viewing and offer workflow, and a tenancy or handover stage at the end. Out of the box Bitrix24 is a general CRM. What makes it a real-estate CRM is the implementation — the custom entities, the portal integrations, the duplicate-lead rules and the automation that sits on top. That implementation is what CIS does.
For a UAE brokerage the difference matters more than elsewhere, because the majority of your leads arrive from three portals rather than from your own website, the same enquiry frequently arrives twice, and agent commission depends on getting attribution right the first time.
Listings published from Bitrix24 or synced back from the portal, and every lead — form, call and WhatsApp — landing in the CRM with the listing reference and agent already attached.
The same pipeline for the Bayut and dubizzle network, including the shared enquiries that produce most of the duplicate-lead problem in a UAE brokerage.
Web forms, live chat and WhatsApp on the official Business API, routed by community, budget or language to the right agent within seconds.
The point of consolidating the three is not tidiness. It is that portal spend can only be judged when cost per qualified lead is measured per portal, per community and per agent — which is impossible while the enquiries live in three inboxes.
| Data | Direction | Refresh | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listings — reference, community, tower, type, beds, size, price | Bitrix24 → portal, or portal → Bitrix24 | Scheduled or on publish | Direction is chosen per brokerage — whichever system your agents already treat as the master |
| Leads — name, phone, email, listing reference, portal | Portal → Bitrix24 | Near real time | Lead source set automatically so portal ROI is measurable |
| Calls and WhatsApp | Two-way | Live | Official WhatsApp Business API; call recording attached to the contact record |
| Duplicate enquiries | Rule-based merge | On arrival | Matched on phone and listing; first-touch agent retained for commission |
| Viewings and offers | In Bitrix24 | — | Calendar, reminders, and an offer stage with document generation |
| Compliance fields — RERA permit, Ejari, title deed, passport and Emirates ID | In Bitrix24 | — | Custom fields plus document storage with expiry reminders, configured to your compliance policy |
A custom entity for properties with community, developer, tower, unit, availability and owner — not deals pretending to be listings.
Enquiry, qualification, viewing, offer, contract, handover — with the SLA timers and escalation that make response time a managed number.
Round-robin, community specialism or language, with holiday and shift awareness so leads never sit unclaimed.
Split rules, referral shares and payout stages tied to the deal, so payroll stops living in a spreadsheet.
Bitrix24 extranet giving landlords visibility of viewings, offers and renewals without giving them your CRM.
Cost per lead by portal, response time by agent, pipeline by community, and renewal exposure by month — in Bitrix24 or Power BI.
A brokerage of 20 to 80 agents typically goes live in six to ten weeks. Weeks one and two are discovery and data — auditing what is in your current system, agreeing the pipeline and mapping the portal fields. Weeks three to six build the configuration, integrations and automation. The remainder is migration, agent training and a supervised first fortnight, because adoption is where CRM projects actually fail. Larger groups with multiple licences or an existing ERP take longer, and we say so before you sign rather than after.
Bitrix24 licensing is separate from implementation and is priced per organisation, not per user on most tiers — which is usually where it wins against a per-seat CRM for a growing brokerage. We will model both against your agent headcount before recommending a tier.
CIS is a Bitrix24 Gold Partner and an Authorized Bitrix24 Trainer, with 472 implementations delivered across 7 countries and 8 years as a Bitrix24 partner. Training accreditation matters more than it sounds: the reason most Bitrix24 rollouts underperform is that nobody taught the agents, and we are certified by the vendor to do exactly that.
We also build the things a brokerage needs around the CRM — WhatsApp and voice agents, portal integrations, Power BI reporting and the automation that connects them. One accountable partner rather than a CRM reseller plus three contractors.
Read the full engagement. A 220-user multi-office UAE brokerage moved every portal, ad and website lead into one Bitrix24 system across 2024–2025. Decision-making 30% faster, 20% less time chasing task updates, 25% faster document turnaround. Read the case study →
Listings and every enquiry into one Bitrix24 pipeline, with source and agent attached.
High-volume Bayut leads routed by rule, with duplicate matching across the shared network.
Volume qualified in the pipeline rather than in an agent’s inbox.
472 implementations, Authorized Bitrix24 Trainer, office at Meydan Grandstand.
An honest comparison for a Dubai brokerage, including where we would not recommend ourselves.
A selection of the brokerages and property companies across Dubai and the wider UAE that CIS has delivered Bitrix24 for.
Bitrix24 licensing is charged per organisation on most commercial tiers rather than per user, so a brokerage adding agents does not pay more for the CRM itself. That is usually where it beats a per-seat platform once you pass roughly fifteen agents. Implementation is quoted separately and depends on how many portals you connect, whether you migrate existing data, and how much automation you want on day one. CIS models licence plus implementation against your agent headcount before you commit.
Yes. Listings can be published from Bitrix24 to the portals or synced back into it, and every enquiry from the portals lands in the CRM with the listing reference, portal and agent attached. The integration is built per brokerage because portal accounts, feed formats and listing structures differ. The commercial reason to do it is attribution: once all three feed one pipeline you can compare cost per qualified lead across them and move budget accordingly.
The same buyer commonly enquires on the same unit through more than one portal. Bitrix24 is configured with matching rules on phone number and listing reference so the second enquiry merges into the first record rather than creating a new one, and the first-touch agent is retained for commission. Both source portals stay recorded on the merged lead so your portal reporting remains accurate.
Bitrix24 is not a regulatory system, but it is where the paperwork lives. We configure custom fields for RERA permit numbers, Ejari contract references, title deeds, passports and Emirates ID, with document storage, expiry reminders and permission rules so only the right roles see them. Compliance workflow is designed with your compliance officer rather than assumed.
For most brokerages under about 150 agents Bitrix24 wins on total cost, because licensing is not per seat and telephony, WhatsApp, tasks, documents and an intranet are included rather than bought as add-ons. Salesforce has the deeper enterprise ecosystem and is the stronger choice for a large developer with complex integration needs. Zoho sits between the two. The honest answer depends on headcount, integration surface and how much you intend to customise.
Six to ten weeks for a 20 to 80 agent brokerage: two weeks of discovery and data mapping, three to four weeks of configuration and integration, then migration, training and a supervised first fortnight. Larger groups take longer. The training period is not optional padding — it is the difference between a CRM that agents use and one they work around.